By Anna Mae Lamentillo

This might not be the typical expat blog, written by a German expat, living in the Philippines since 1999. It's different. In English and in German. Check it out! Enjoy reading! Dies mag' nun wirklich nicht der typische Auswandererblog eines Deutschen auf den Philippinen sein. Er soll etwas anders sein. In Englisch und in Deutsch! Viel Spass beim Lesen!

Published Oct 24, 2025 08:40 am
For many Filipinos, coping with life’s daily pressures begins with a quiet prayer or a much-needed rest.
A Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey conducted from Sept. 24 to 30 found that praying or engaging in spiritual activities is the most common way Filipinos deal with stress, cited by 16 percent of 1,500 adult respondents nationwide.
Resting or sleeping ranked second at 14 percent, followed by going out or taking leisure trips at 11 percent.
Other ways of coping included thinking positively (7 percent), focusing on work or school and ignoring problems (6 percent each), spending time with family and exercising or going for a walk (5 percent each), and engaging in leisure or social activities such as playing sports or online games, doing household chores, talking with friends or neighbors, watching television or movies, eating, and singing or listening to music (4 percent each).
A smaller share of respondents said they scroll on social media or drink alcohol (2 percent each), while very few mentioned gardening or farming and smoking cigarettes (1 percent each), crying (0.4 percent), or seeking medical help (0.2 percent).
SWS said women were found to rely on prayer more than men when managing stress.
Twenty percent of women said they turn to prayer or spiritual activities to cope, while men were more inclined to rest (14 percent).
Among female respondents, rest or sleep was the next most common stress reliever (14 percent), followed by thinking positively (7 percent).
Meanwhile, men were more likely to cope by getting rest or sleep (14 percent), followed by going out (13 percent) and praying (12 percent).
SWS also said that prayer was the dominant response in Balance Luzon (19 percent) and Metro Manila (16 percent), while rest and sleep were the top choices in Mindanao (19 percent) and the Visayas (15 percent).
The Third Quarter 2025 Social Weather Survey was conducted through face-to-face interviews of 1,500 adults (18 years old and above) nationwide: 300 in Metro Manila, 600 in Balance Luzon (or Luzon outside Metro Manila), and 300 each in the Visayas and Mindanao.
READ MORE:
mb.com.ph/2025/10/09/feeling-stressed-youre-not-alone-survey-shows-more-filipinos-do




By Fr. Roy Cimagala
Chaplain
Center for Industrial Technology and Enterprise (CITE)
Talamban, Cebu City
Email: roycimagala@gmail.com
UNLESS our human laws can capture the logic behind that divine commandment to love one another as Christ has loved us and continues to love us, even to the extent of loving our enemies, we can only say that indeed our human laws, despite all the good things they can accomplish, can only do so much for us.
Our human laws can only struggle to capture the divine wisdom of loving our enemies because they are designed more to maintain order, human justice and protection within a society, whereas the commandment to love our enemies is a moral and spiritual teaching that certainly goes beyond the scope of legal codes.
Our human laws can mandate behaviors like not harming others, but they cannot legislate things that are mainly on the spiritual and supernatural levels which actually are the ultimate dimensions that shape our life not only as persons but also as children of God, created in God’s image and likeness.
While we obviously need to be governed by the rule of law, we should also see to it that we manage to distinguish between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law, and know how to understand and apply our human laws properly.
Ideally, both the letter and the spirit of a certain law should be in perfect harmony. But that is hardly the case in real life. The problem, of course, is that the articulation of the law is conditioned and limited by our human powers that cannot fully capture the richness of human life, considering its spiritual and supernatural character that will always involve the intangibles and mysteries and the like.
That is the reason why we can go beyond but not against a particular human law, when such law cannot fully express the concrete conditions of a particular case. We know very well that strictly following the letter of the law may not align with the law’s intent or broader justice. We need to discern the spirit of the law that involves considering the context, intent of the lawmakers, and the ultimate purpose the law aims to achieve.
For this, we have to understand, first of all, that all our laws should be based on what is known as the natural law that in the end is a participation in the divine eternal law of God, our Creator and the first and ultimate lawgiver. And that part of natural law that is specific to man is called the natural moral law that would recognize, as its first principle, God as our Creator and source and end of all laws.
A legal system not clearly based on this fundamental principle about laws would already be a system that is defective ab initio. A legal system that is based only on some human consensus would put the spirit of the law in full subservience to the letter of that law.
Our human laws certainly need continuing refinement. They should not be regarded as something static or stagnant, averse to the need for improvement. They should continually be diligently perceptive to evolving things, and should be adaptive to new conditions.
That's simply because charity, truth, justice, and mercy, which our laws should in the end embody, have aspects that can be mysterious and that will always demand new requirements from us.
Let's hope that the proper structures are made available to address this ongoing need with respect to continually polishing our laws.
Let me clarify that my response is based on my experiences and observations in my own relationships and in the relationships of people around me.
What tampo is not
It’s not the same “silent treatment” as it is known and used in the Western World.
It's not even “sulking” as it is often translated.
What tampo looks like
It is essentially a withdrawal of active engagement with another person or a group of persons. Filipinos are known to be hospitable and they actively go out of their way to make people feel comfortable and they belong. We are generally friendly in that way. So, when a Filipino has “tampo” or a sense of injured feelings, they will withdraw from active engagement.
In close personal relationships, Filipinos give of themselves and often sacrificially. This is how we show how we value people and our relationships with people. We desire close personal ties with people who are important to us because we love them or admire them. We want to be part of their lives as they are part of ours.
Filipinos are collectivist in the way they think and are not nearly as individualistic as Westerners. While Westerners work toward self-fulfillment, Filipinos work toward smooth relationships with significant others. This is how they measure fulfillment.
They actively try to get to know people as they ever enlarge their social group of acquaintances and friends who may one day become part of their family as in-laws or as fictive relatives (inaanak, kinakapatid, ninong or ninang), or become their boss at work or their business partner.
For Filipinos, confrontational communication is not always the first, the best, or the wisest way to tell people they are doing something wrong or hurtful. Filipinos are ever mindful of social class and social hierarchy. Filipinos relate differently and even speak differently to older people, and those who have high educational attainment or a high position in an enterprise.
When people in power over them at work or school, or when people with authority over them in the family act in ways that hurt Filipinos, tampo or pag-tatampo is a way for Filipinos to show that they were hurt without directly challenging or confronting those in authority over them. To tell them off or to sass them would be bad social form, it shows ill-breeding.
For Filipinos, direct communication to someone they love is often unthinkable. One cannot tell one’s parent or spouse that they are wrong or they are causing hurt because to directly communicate this would jeopardize the relationships they are trying to build and maintain with them.
And the hurt or the grief that causes the “tampo” response is still real. It must be expressed. It signals that some unspoken line or boundary has been breached. But the hurt or grief cannot be expressed in a direct way to break the relationship.
Pag-tatampo is a softer way of showing displeasure, disappointment, hurt, or anger without embarrassing or humiliating the person who had caused the hurt.
The goal of tampo is to express grief, hurt or displeasure, but there is also an implicit invitation for whoever has caused the hurt to examine their behavior, to reflect, to inquire, and make amends to restore the relationship.
Filipinos are generally relational. They treat others as well as they expect to be treated. They expect others to actively mend relationships that may be neglected or overlooked and in danger of being broken.
In this way, “tampo” is a way most Filipinos gauge whether your esteem of them is as high as their esteem of you. This is a way of probing whether the relationship is reciprocal and equally caring and thoughtful, if the desire to continue relating to each other is mutual.
Consider in a romantic relationship, there are two people who are exclusively sharing their time and resources. Respect, affection, and esteem must be mutual. Both people in the relationship must act and behave toward each other with loyalty and affection. In dealing with others outside the relationship (their family or their friend group) they must signal that their ultimate loyalty belongs to their partner or spouse who is their priority.
A woman whose husband forgets her birthday, for instance, will not confront her husband about it. She will not immediately react in anger because she does not want to end the relationship. She does not want to damage it. She merely wants to express that some social or relational obligation has been neglected and must be given attention, remedied, and restored.
She also considers that his forgetting may not have been an act of neglect or a cooling of his affection. He may have had his wallet stolen, or his boss at work may have disciplined him. His car or his tools-in-trade may have broken down and his meagre resources may have been used to fix those or replace them. This means the husband may have had to choose between “forgetting” (not giving a present on) his wife’s birthday may have been because the husband used his meagre resources to neutralize a threat to the family’s source of income. If that were the case, then the husband may have caused the wife grief or hurt, but it was not intentional. And so, getting angry is not the best way to express her hurt when the husband had big problems to take care of and taking care of them would surely benefit the relationship.
If the husband values his wife in the same way and with the same intensity as the wife values her husband, then the husband will immediately notice that something has shifted a bit in the way the wife related to him. He will begin to think what could have caused it. He retraces his steps, he figures it out, and he seeks to address his wife's sudden coolness toward him.
He does this by “panunuyo” or “susuyuin niya ulit” ang wife niya. He may come home with flowers or he may ask her out on a date, or he may hand her some money for a new dress, or just spend time doing with her whatever she wants to do. The woman may use part of the money given to her to buy something for her husband, too, to show that she appreciates the gesture.
The relationship is restored in its fervor. The wife is satisfied that her husband has noticed the slight shift. This means that he is actively regarding her (may pagtingin pa sa kaniya), and that she has enough “halaga” or value to him that he relates to her as actively as she related to him by acts of loving attention and service.
It's not quite so much the money value of whatever gift that is important as the thoughts and motivations behind the gift. It is the esteem which the husband holds for the wife that is important. It's the fact that he noticed her because he was looking at her the whole time, but sometimes life gets in the way.
Faith in the reciprocity and mutual nature of the relationship is restored. Intimacy is renewed and may even heighten. Because the suyuan that follows the tampo is the opportunity for both to know each other better.
Filipinos will go out of their way to tend to relationships that are important to them. They expect the same tending from others who seek to have a long and satisfying relationship with them as well.
I told my daughter about this post right after I uploaded it, and she made a point that had not occurred to me. The tampo is a way to minimize the noise of conflict in a relationship, a way of ensuring that others in the community will not notice too much for the couple to become the object of gossip.
In a small Filipino farming community where planting and harvesting chores are communal activities, the community is quick to notice conflict. A couple cannot tell their neighbors that it is none of their business. A possible breakdown of a relationship is the community's business, because it will affect the community activities of harvesting and planting.
Of course, now, Filipinos live in cities and very few are farmers, but there are still community activities—the fiesta, politics and elections are still community activities. The breakdown of marital and familial relationships impact how people move in their community.
Mainly because the development of the Germanic languages was somehow more independent itself, the different dialects of Proto- Germanic, that joint the three subdivisions inside Germanic family, separated in a very early period of time, evolving in different geographical areas considerably separated from each other that somehow it gave them more freedom of developing independently allowing to shape them different features and innovations, besides all the ancient Proto- Germanic dialects had no written evidences or they hardly had ( taking as base some runic inscriptions), when a language or dialect is basically spoken and not written as a general rule is more susceptible to change faster than a language with a long attestation of written evidences.
Latin is a language quite documented itself, but Romance languages don't descend themselves from this type of Latin that it's classic Latin that was somehow the cult version of the language that they originally spoke the ruling elites of the Roman Empire.
All Romance languages descend from Vulgar Latin that was the form of Latin spoken by ordinary peoples that lived in the provinces that were part of Roman Empire that continued being spoken after the defunction of the empire ( the term “vulgar” meant back then something related to ordinary people and it didn't have pejorative connotations that the term has nowadays). Vulgar Latin unlike Latin classic is not widely documented and it's not precise to know with accuracy on what exact period of time, it turned into the earlier forms of Romance languages spoken nowadays, even it's spoken and discussed that Romance languages could descend from a hypothetical Proto- language called Proto- Romance ( the same way Germanic languages are believed to descend from Proto- Germanic).
The separation around the different dialectal varieties of Vulgar Latin produced much later with a gap of many centuries in comparison to the division of different branches of Proto- Germanic that produced on much earlier period of time. In fact many Romance languages have texts from the 10th, 11th and 12th centuries, some of them from the 9th centuries, some Germanic languages are attested since the 6th, 7th and 8th centuries, Gothic is the earliest attested Germanic language with texts dated on the 4th century. On centuries where they clearly attested the earliest forms of some Germanic languages spoken nowadays, Vulgar Latin was still spoken in the areas that in the past they were Roman provinces.
In conclusion the division around Germanic languages was much earlier than the Romance languages that stayed more united for many centuries through Latin that started to diverge much later taking as a key event the downfall of Roman Empire.
Schon Tausende tote Tiere
Einsatzkräfte der Feuerwehr entsorgen verendete Kraniche in einem Container am Stausee Kelbra (Sachsen-Anhalt)
Stephanie
Walter
Die Vogelgrippe breitet sich in Deutschland immer weiter aus – und die Sorge wächst. In mehreren Bundesländern – darunter Hessen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern und Niedersachsen – werden zunehmend erkrankte und verendete Vögel gemeldet. Besonders dramatisch ist die Lage in Brandenburg und Sachsen-Anhalt: Rund um den Stausee Kelbra wurden bereits etwa 500 tote Kraniche gefunden, in Brandenburg sollen es sogar mehr als 1000 sein. Und ein Ende ist nicht in Sicht – mit dem Vogelzug erreichen täglich neue Tiere die Rastgebiete. BILD beantwortet die wichtigsten Fragen zur aktuellen Lage.
Nach Angaben des Friedrich-Loeffler-Instituts (FLI) ist das Risiko einer Ansteckung für die allgemeine Bevölkerung gering. „Etwas mehr gefährdet sind die Menschen, die wirklich mit den infizierten und toten Vögeln zu tun haben“, sagt FLI-Präsidentin Christa Kühn.
Mitarbeiter in Schutzanzügen entsorgen die toten Kraniche in Brandenburg
In einem Teich in Brandenburg liegt ein toter Kranich
Nein. Es gibt keine Hinweise, dass Menschen sich über den Verzehr von Geflügelfleisch oder Eiern infiziert haben. Das Virus wird bei hoher Temperatur zerstört. Wichtig ist: Geflügel immer gut durchgaren – kein rosa Fleisch, kein roter Saft! Eier sollten gekocht werden, bis Eiweiß und Eigelb fest sind.
Ja! Verbraucher können sich ihren Gänsebraten weiter schmecken lassen. Wer Fleisch ordentlich erhitzt, hat nichts zu befürchten. Das Virus ist hitzeempfindlich, bei mindestens 70 Grad wird es unschädlich.
Ein Landwirt in Kremmen (Brandenburg) musste 5000 Gänse keulen. Ein Kranich fiel tot auf seine Wiese, wo er die Gänse hält
Wer tote Vögel findet, soll den Fundort den Veterinärbehörden melden, sie aber nicht selbst anfassen. Auch Haustiere sollten ferngehalten werden. Spaziergänge in Rastgebieten – etwa an den Linumer Teichen (Brandenburg) – sind derzeit nicht erlaubt. Führungen wurden abgesagt. „Jede Störung führt dazu, dass die Tiere gestresst sind und anfälliger für das Virus werden“, warnt FLI-Präsidentin Kühn.
Vor allem durch Wildvögel. Kraniche, Gänse oder Enten tragen das Virus über ihren Kot weiter. Wer in Rastgebieten unterwegs ist, kann die Erreger über Schuhe oder Kleidung verschleppen und so andere Gebiete gefährden.
Geflügelbetriebe müssen strenge Hygienevorschriften einhalten: Tiere sollen abgesondert oder in Ställen gehalten werden. Desinfektionsmaßnahmen und Schutzkleidung sind Pflicht. Es darf kein Kontakt zwischen Nutz- und Wildvögeln entstehen. So soll verhindert werden, dass die Seuche von Wildvögeln auf Nutztiere überspringt.
In Brandenburg und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mussten zuletzt über 160.000 Tiere getötet werden. Besonders betroffen: das Linumer Teichgebiet mit mehr als 1000 toten Kranichen. Experten sprechen von einem „beispiellosen Ausbruch“.
Das hochgefährliche Vogelgrippe-Virus befällt das Nervensystem der Tiere. Sie verlieren die Kontrolle über ihre Flugmuskulatur – sie taumeln, verlieren die Orientierung und stürzen im Flug ab. Zudem legen Kraniche auf ihrem Weg nach Süden Tausende Kilometer zurück. Ist ihr Körper durch das Virus geschwächt, brechen sie in der Luft zusammen, weil Herz und Kreislauf versagen.