By Derco Rosal

This might not be the typical expat blog, written by a German expat, living in the Philippines since 1999. It's different. In English and in German. Check it out! Enjoy reading! Dies mag' nun wirklich nicht der typische Auswandererblog eines Deutschen auf den Philippinen sein. Er soll etwas anders sein. In Englisch und in Deutsch! Viel Spass beim Lesen!

By Derco Rosal
Published Jun 18, 2026 05:30 pm
President Marcos’ chief economic manager has raised concerns over the country’s high digital transaction costs, pushing for reforms that would align fees across public and private payment channels and slash charges from their current levels.
Speaking during a media roundtable, Finance Secretary Frederick D. Go said that reducing these transaction costs is a primary agenda of his leadership, citing the stark gap between local fees and those in neighboring Asian nations.
“There’s one thing I’m obsessing about—the very high digital transaction costs in the Philippines,” Go told reporters, pointing out that local transaction fees can soar to as high as ₱50, while regional peers charge only cents or nothing at all.
Go’s sentiments mirror the recent International Monetary Fund (IMF) report, which flagged the country's expensive domestic fees as an outlier in the region. The IMF attributed these higher costs to the Philippines’ fragmented financial infrastructure.
This persistent problem has prompted the finance chief to express his intent to leave a “legacy” of bringing digital payment costs down. “Our objective is simple: digital payments should be fast, secure, convenient, and affordable,” he said.
For Go, the ideal cost could be as low as ₱2, noting that payment operations still incur basic processing fees.
To set the pace, the Department of Finance (DOF) is already putting the government’s own financial machinery to work.
As chairman of the Land Bank of the Philippines (Landbank), Go shared that he did not mince words with the state-run lender’s executives when questioning their previous ₱15 transaction fee. “I told them, why are you charging people ₱15? What is the bare cost to the bank?” he recalled.
That directive prompted the state-run lender to slash its person-to-person (P2P) fees from ₱15 to ₱8.
To further catalyze digital adoption, Landbank is currently running a trial offering zero convenience fees for person-to-government (P2G) transactions for agencies like the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA).
Go believes this move will spark a chain reaction across the industry. “You only need one of the major players to lower its fees, and competition will follow. Once that happens, convenience fees will come down. I think this will also put pressure on agencies that continue to charge high convenience fees,” he said.
Clearing hidden technical friction is another hurdle the existing system needs to overcome. According to Go, banks within the domestic financial system must achieve true interoperability, allowing users to transfer funds across institutions without incurring steep penalties. If digital transactions must have any costs at all, those should ideally be limited to minimal switching fees, Go noted.
The Finance chief added that industry feedback on these measures is currently being solicited, with ongoing talks between the DOF, the Bankers Association of the Philippines (BAP), and the Fintech Alliance PH—efforts he said align with the central bank’s overarching direction.
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) previously sought to require operators of payment systems (OPS) to price fund transfer charges in line with market rates. Under the central bank’s framework, however, initial plans to completely eliminate fees on small-value fund transfers were ultimately shelved.
Go’s agenda also targets lowering remittance costs for overseas Filipino workers (OFWs). Just as he questioned domestic banking transaction costs, he raised a red flag over average remittance fees that hover around 10 percent.
For the Finance chief, the current status quo is a "pitiful" tax on labor. “It’s crazy! It’s blood, sweat, and tears at 10 percent just for sending money back home,” he lamented, stressing that the mission to slash costs must ensure the earnings of Filipinos working abroad are not eroded by digital tolls.
Lawmakers have also picked up the mantle, pushing for the passage of the OFWs Remittance Protection Act, a measure that aims to reduce remittance fees for OFWs by half to protect offshore workers from excessive charges and financial exploitation.
Published Jun 15, 2026 12:05 pm
Money sent home by overseas Filipinos (OFs) fell to $2.72 billion in April, dropping from the $2.87 billion recorded in March to hit its lowest level since May last year, as tighter budgets constrained cash transfers.
According to the latest data from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) released on Monday, June 15, cash remittances in April emerged as the lowest in nearly a year, since hitting $2.66 billion in May 2025. Despite the month-on-month decline, cash remittances increased by 2 percent compared to the $2.66 billion recorded in April last year.
During the month, land-based workers contributed $2.12 billion to the total, a 2.1 percent year-on-year increase, while sea-based workers brought in $590 million, up 1.9 percent. The BSP noted that cash remittances in April remained resilient “amid prevailing global economic conditions.”
Meanwhile, Ruben Carlo O. Asuncion, chief economist at the Union Bank of the Philippines, said the softer April inflows were due to cautious cash transfers driven by “tighter budgets” among overseas workers facing global uncertainty. Asuncion added that news about the looming signing of a peace deal between the US and Iran “could help stabilize employment prospects and support remittance flows from the region, reducing downside risks in the near term.”
“Overall, remittances should remain resilient, but growth is likely to stay modest as elevated inflation continues to constrain both senders and recipients,” Asuncion said.
For SM Investments Corp. Group economist Robert Dan Roces, the month-on-month easing could not necessarily be attributed to the Middle East conflict, as it typically points to seasonality or changes in deployment and transfers.
“One month of softer remittances is usually more about timing effects, seasonality, or fluctuations in deployment and transfers rather than a direct impact from the Middle East conflict,” Roces said, adding that it is too hasty to link a single month’s data to the war. “If anything, the bigger concern is whether a prolonged conflict starts affecting employment, incomes, or the mobility of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) in the region.”
Personal remittances—a broader category that includes informal channels and in-kind transfers—reached $3.04 billion during the month, up 2.1 percent from $2.97 billion in the same month last year.
From January to April, cash remittances increased by 2.6 percent to $11.40 billion from $11.11 billion in the same period last year. This year-to-date figure follows a record-breaking performance in 2025, when annual cash inflows reached an all-time high of $35.63 billion.
During the first four months of 2026, the United States (US) remained the primary source of cash remittances, accounting for 39.7 percent of the total. This was followed by Singapore at 7.3 percent, Saudi Arabia at 6.4 percent, Japan at 5.1 percent, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) at 4.6 percent.
Cumulative personal remittances for the first four months reached $12.70 billion, a 2.7 percent increase from the $12.37 billion recorded a year earlier.
According to the BSP, the US’s dominance as a source is partly due to the common practice of remittance centers abroad routing funds through US-based correspondent banks. Additionally, several money couriers are headquartered in the US, leading banks to attribute the origin of funds to the most immediate source rather than the actual country where the worker is located.
Cash remittances, which serve as a major economic growth engine, accounted for 7.4 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) in the first quarter of 2026. They accounted for 7.3 percent of GDP in 2025, a slight decline from 7.5 percent in 2024 and 7.7 percent in 2023.
For the full year of 2026, the BSP forecasts cash remittances to reach $36.7 billion, representing a 3 percent growth rate from the actual 2025 figure. However, this expansion is expected to ease from the

By Derco Rosal
Often one of the few women representing the Philippines on the global stage, Maria Teresa Habitan reflects on her rise through the Department of Finance. Comparing her experience to Hidden Figures, Habitan credits the “strength and clash of principles” among female leaders for navigating the country through historic economic hurdles and legislative battles.
Often one of the few women representing the Philippines on the global stage, Maria Teresa Habitan reflects on her rise through the Department of Finance. Comparing her experience to Hidden Figures, Habitan credits the “strength and clash of principles” among female leaders for navigating the country through historic economic hurdles and legislative battles.
Who knew that helping a friend find her way to a finance job application on Mabini Street could launch a long-term career in fiscal management? For Maria Teresa Habitan, that chance act was the first of many “happy accidents” that would shape her rise to veteran status.
Habitan first stepped through the gates of the Department of Finance (DOF) in the waning years of dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s collapsing administration. She would exit decades later, shortly after the election of the dictator’s son, Ferdinand Marcos Jr., to the presidency.
Fresh out of university in the 1970s, Habitan soon found herself standing before a whirring, scraping xerox machine, reproducing finance documents, or feeding papers into screeching fax machines to send scanned files.
Moments later, she would find herself seated in a meeting, representing the DOF, being asked— while spooning soup—about matters she barely understood. She would evenetually get quietly rescued by someone else in the room.
Habitan readily admits that, despite earning an economics degree from the University of the Philippines (UP), much of the discussion in those early high-level meetings went over her head.
For the long-serving finance assistant secretary, the first five years of her nearly four-and-a-half-decade career at the DOF were spent reconciling classroom theory with the realities on the ground.
She recalls her first flight to Washington, braving America’s cold weather in a borrowed jacket.
Before long, however, the pressure of navigating the Philippines’ mounting foreign debt set in, forcing Habitan to fully grasp the weight of helping manage a nation’s fragile economy.
“I felt the pressure when the Philippines had a debt crisis in October 1983,” Habitan told this author. Under the fading rule of Marcos Sr., the country became the first in Asia to be swept into the debt crisis of the 1980s—an economic blow compounded by political uncertainty.
To gain breathing room amid swelling obligations to foreign lenders, the Philippines sought a three-month moratorium on debt servicing. Three years later, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) slightly eased its terms, though only within limits, as the country’s debt continued to balloon despite ongoing reforms.
Defense
Several times, Habitan felt the urge to defend the Philippines from foreign ridicule—yet she and her colleagues also shared the instinct to disappear from the judging gaze.
She recalled one such moment during a debt seminar in Thailand, where reports showed ASEAN economies in solid fiscal shape—except for the Philippines. The Mexican resource person repeatedly singled out the country, prompting Habitan and her colleagues to quietly retreat from view.
“There were four of us from the Philippines, all women, and at first we just wanted to go home,” she said. “But over lunch, we ended up at a table with a Mexican speaker—he didn’t even realize there were Filipinos in the seminar.”
After that shared meal, the speaker noticeably eased his focus on the Philippines. “That’s when I realized that charm can actually work,” Habitan told Manila Bulletin, her chin-length, medium-brown bob framing a face that has since become familiar in fiscal circles.
Habitan is often seen in sleeveless tops paired with slacks, or a blazer matched with a knee-length skirt, finished with closed-toe pumps. She typically accents her composed presence with golden pearl stud earrings and a matching necklace.
Standing beside her were three other female officials—a scene reminiscent of the film Hidden Figures, with one crucial difference: these women were not working behind the scenes. They were visibly present, holding their ground in direct dialogue with multilateral lenders.
“Almost all the secretaries and economic managers were men, but all their deputies and undersecretaries were women—and they were incredibly strong,” Habitan said.
“You could see them in action during IMF negotiations, and in the Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) meetings as well. You could really witness the clash of principles—it was impressive,” she added.
Habitan spoke of this with unmistakable feminist pride—a disposition perhaps shaped by her fondness for strong-minded heroines in the novels she read, or maybe by her own taste for the boldly spicy flavors of pinangat.
Still, she acknowledged the difficulty of negotiating with the country’s creditors.
“You feel like a victim. You know you’re at fault—but it’s their fault too. They’re the creditors. So why did they keep lending to us without doing their due diligence?” she said, noting that the hardship was heightened by the fact that the Philippines stood alone with a debt problem at the time.
Part of her regular work involved presenting the more positive developments in Philippine economic policy to debt watchers and the IMF. “It’s like defending your thesis every quarter—with the IMF,” she said.
“We knew what we wanted to do technically—but Congress had to legislate it,” Habitan explained, adding that this legislative hurdle was often the main obstacle to reforms the Department of Finance sought to implement.
‘Lost’ battles
Guided by her philosophy on taxation, Habitan believes that no tax measure is ever truly wasted, given that the legislative process is long and far from instant. If anything, she says, patience is essential, as the passage of future laws is often delayed.
“Pushing for policy reform isn’t instant noodles—it’s a slow burn. You can’t do it all at once. You need to study, and you need to work with people who don’t always agree with you,” she told this author.
Among the reforms that have faced repeated deferment since the DOF’s push in the 1990s are CREATE MORE, fiscal incentives reform, and amendments to the mining law.
Even with this reality, Habitan said the country needs fiscal authorities who are principled enough to firmly hold the DOF’s ground amid public pressure. This, she noted, is often where fiscal managers are misunderstood—mistaken for being “heartless” or “arrogant,” labels she herself has received.
“One can listen and, at the same time, stay firm in one’s position,” she said. “Even if I know I’ll lose the hearing, I put the DOF position on record.”
Now vice chancellor of the Philippine Tax Academy (PTA), overseeing the Local Government Finance Institute (LGFI), Habitan continues to stand by the tax philosophy that defined her career.
For her, “everybody should pay at least a minimum tax—no matter what,” underpinning her belief that taxes are the lifeblood of government, funding services ultimately meant to benefit the people who pay them.
At the same time, she stressed that tax authorities must de-complexify the process of paying taxes. She stressed compliance should be simpler, fairer, and more humane, as red tape only hinders efficient tax collection.
Habitan keeps her fingers crossed for a more informed citizenry, particularly on why tax revenues are collected. For the DOF, meanwhile, she hopes for a corps of staff deeply invested in policy work—engaging stakeholders and advancing comprehensive tax education.
“Taxes are unpopular. Be ready to be unpopular if you’re with the DOF. You’re not here to be loved. You should aim to be respected,” the veteran said, adding that clear principles must be matched with political courage and savviness, as taxes remain “the most difficult kind of legislation.”
Perhaps what would truly make this veteran happy—aside from solving puzzles and binge-watching K-dramas—is witnessing a renewed sense of patriotism, expressed through progressive tax measures.
Pride-worthy, even, if foreign players could take a closer look at how the Philippine government operates and consider it as a model—as was the case with the Philippines being a model of transparency for the extractive industries that Habitan once headed.
By Derco Rosal
Published Jun 16, 2025 04:05 pm
Cash sent home by Filipinos working and living overseas continued to increase in April, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) data showed, reflecting stable global employment abroad.
Money sent in by overseas Filipinos (OFs) increased by four percent to $2.7 billion in April from $2.6 billion in the same month last year, the BSP reported.
Cash remittances for the first four months also rose by three percent to $11.1 billion from $ 10.78 billion posted in the same period last year.
Cash remittances coursed through banks in the first four months were predominantly from the United States (US), followed by Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and Japan, according to BSP’s statement released on Monday, June 26.
As such, remittances for these countries were the drivers of the overall increase during the period.
By source, the US remained the top source of cash remittances during the period at 40.4 percent, followed by Singapore (7.3 percent) and Saudi Arabia (6.3 percent).
Several money transfer centers in countries abroad send money through partner banks, known as correspondent banks, most of which are based in the US, the central bank noted.
It added that remittances sent through money couriers are recorded under the country where their main offices are based—often the US—rather than the actual country of origin.
“Therefore, the US would appear to be the main source of OF [overseas Filipino] remittances because banks attribute the origin of funds to the most immediate source,” the BSP said.
Personal remittances, or the sum of transfers sent in cash or in-kind via informal channels, also increased by 4.1 percent to $3 billion in April from $2.9 billion in the previous year.
Year-to-date personal remittances also climbed by three percent to $12.4 billion from the $12 billion registered in January-to-April period last year.
The BSP attributed the increase in personal remittances to the rise in both land-based and sea-based OFs
John Paolo Rivera, senior research fellow at state-run policy think tank Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), said that the increase in cash remittances “shows underlying strength in remittance flows, driven by stable overseas employment, particularly in the US, Middle East, and parts of Asia.”
“Moving forward, remittance growth is likely to remain steady, supported by demand for OFWs abroad, especially in healthcare, logistics, and domestic services,” Rivera said.
Rivera noted that weaker peso may encourage more US dollar remittances, but risks such as inflation in host countries, geopolitical tensions, and potential policy changes like remittance taxes in key markets like the US could weigh on future inflows.