You plan to move to the Philippines? Wollen Sie auf den Philippinen leben?

There are REALLY TONS of websites telling us how, why, maybe why not and when you'll be able to move to the Philippines. I only love to tell and explain some things "between the lines". Enjoy reading, be informed, have fun and be entertained too!

Ja, es gibt tonnenweise Webseiten, die Ihnen sagen wie, warum, vielleicht warum nicht und wann Sie am besten auf die Philippinen auswandern könnten. Ich möchte Ihnen in Zukunft "zwischen den Zeilen" einige zusätzlichen Dinge berichten und erzählen. Viel Spass beim Lesen und Gute Unterhaltung!


Visitors of germanexpatinthephilippines/Besucher dieser Webseite.Ich liebe meine Flaggensammlung!

free counters

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Best wishes and goodbye

My column in MINDANAO DAILY

When letters were the only form of written correspondence, signing off was obvious. Actually I am still  adopting that old tradition. No matter, if it comes to letters or emails. It's just a matter of respect and education.

If addressing a sir or madam, it was unambiguous. You concluded "yours faithfully". When writing to a specific person – for example, a Mr or (hey, ladies first!) – it was simple, your letter would always be signed off "yours sincerely". Only missives to family or close friends would ever finish with a "love from" or "with much love, yours".

For many people, there's a weird status thing when it comes to the more blunt you are in emails. I'm asking myself, why? An email is just a letter - an online one ... .

Sad to say,  the arrival of email has disrupted this etiquette, making the rules far less obvious. Indeed, for many of us there are no rules. A whole subculture of personalized email sign-offs has emerged everything from "TTFN" to "peace out". And of course, it’s not just what we say but why we say it. Neither in English nor in any other language. I get the same stuff in German written emails and even letters or text messages.

"Emails have become the medium of business, leisure, family, love and everything,” says children’s author Michael Rosen. When we sign off emails, we try to give off the "right vibe", he adds. He says it’s all about how we want to come across to the recipient. "Thoughtful, grateful or just very, very busy?" Oh sure, we are all so very, very busy... .

Some of the most successful business people are notoriously blunt in email communication – if they even bother with a sign-off at all.

"There's a weird status thing when it comes to the more blunt you are in emails, the more you can be (blunt) because you're senior in the company," says author Emma Gannon, recalling the editor of a famous newspaper whose response to pitches was often just a curt "yep" or "nope".

Although being succinct can convey a certain authority and status, it also communicates a dose of self-importance or arrogance. And we’ve all dealt with bosses who fire off email edicts of "is this done?" or "update me on that".

Even if they are not so direct, many emailers like to convey a sense of being busy by using or adapting abbreviations. So "kind regards" becomes "KR", or "yours" may do away with pesky vowels to leave "yrs". Heaven forbid!

"When someone signed off 'BR' for 'best regards', I just thought they were cold, brrr," says Gannon. And, in my opinion, sorry to say, I even don't reply anymore after receiving such correspondence. Oh sure, we are all busy, but there should be just a minimum of respect, if I communicate with someone. In business or personal. By letter, email or text message. 

Many times, there are those who pare it down to the absolute minimum, signing off with simply their name or even just the initial letter of their forename. Others might omit a sign off altogether. While this may come across as peremptory or rude, at least it avoids misinterpretation.

Nearly formal but not totally formal, but they're not as informal as 'CU in a MNT on bus OMW'. 

Some people swing the other way and end their emails with an altogether friendlier tone. While most would consider that kisses have no place in a business environment, they often creep into emails – and sometimes from people the recipient has never even met. For some, an "x" at the end of an email is a friendly endnote; for others it is totally inappropriate.

Even just calling someone by first name, is not the way how it should be in business.

What’s clear is that some British terms used to end emails just do not translate well. A casual "cheers" is frequently used as a sign off on UK emails, but can be utterly perplexing for other nationalities. Not surprising when a hearty "cheers" also can be used for clinking glasses at the pub, or to thank a checkout person at the supermarket. Here we have to deal with British and American English.

For author Michael Rosen, emails now occupy a halfway house between texts and letters.

"The key thing is that emails aren't the same as letters. I position them in my mind as a sort of halfway place between texts and hard copy letters: nearly formal but not totally formal, but they're not as informal as 'CU in a MNT on bus OMW'," says Rosen. I strongly agree with him.

And, he adds given their place in this ambiguous no-man’s land of communication, it follows that there will continue to be a whole raft of ways to say "goodbye".

Best wishes and goodbye.

Filipinos relieved by divorce ruling


Divorce obtained abroad by a Filipina married to a foreigner recognized by Philippine top court...

Image Credit: Istockphoto

Gulf News


Dubai: Divorce obtained abroad and initiated by Filipinos with foreign spouses will now be recognised in the Philippines in a landmark ruling by its Supreme Court.
The Philippines’ top court on Tuesday ruled in favour of Marelyn Tanedo Manalo, a Filipina divorced from her Japanese husband.

Manalo’s divorce was granted in Japan in 2011. Based on Philippine laws, however, a local court must recognise the ruling before it can be considered valid in the Philippines.
Divorce is legal around the world except in two nation-states — the Philippines and the Vatican. An absolute divorce bill is pending in congress.
Marriages in the Philippines can be dissolved in two ways: through a declaration of nullity or through annulment.
Attorney Barney Almazar, director of Gulf Law and counsel of some Filipinos seeking annulment and divorce in the UAE, said the ruling makes the process easier for Filipinos seeking recognition for their foreign divorce decree. But it is limited in scope.
“Once the foreign decree is recognised, the court will order the civil registrar to dissolve the marriage and annotate the marriage certificate accordingly. This process may take about a year but is definitely faster, cheaper and less complicated than annulment,” Almazar told Gulf News.
Manalo’s court proceedings ran for nearly seven years from the Regional Trial Court until it reached the Supreme Court (SC).
Almazar noted, however, that the ruling does not apply to two Filipinos seeking divorce.
“Marriages between two Filipinos are not covered by this exemption. If the parties are both Filipinos, only annulment or declaration of nullity of marriage will dissolve the marriage. Divorce secured between two Filipinos will be valid worldwide except in the Philippines and the Vatican,” Almazar said.
“The parties to a divorce may find themselves in a peculiar situation where they have two marital statuses — married in the Philippines and single in the rest of the world,” he added.
Gulf News last week reported the case of Jun, a Filipino who got a divorce in the UAE but is still technically married in the Philippines. Their annulment proceedings have been ongoing for the past three years.
Jun earlier said he favours the divorce bill to be enacted as the annulment process takes a long time and has already burnt a hole in their pockets.
Prior to the SC ruling, only divorce secured by the foreign spouse will capacitate the Filipino partner to remarry. The latter can now remarry even if he or she was the initiator of the divorce, according to the ruling.

Boracay's final day sees ...

... mad rush to sell food, souvenirs

One more swim marks sentimental good-bye to the Philippine island’s talc beaches
Gulf News
Manila: Restaurants and stores rushed to sell food and souvenir items. Tourists dipped for the last time into the blue sea. Others griped about the presence of Coast Guard vessels, Navy Seals, and police.
Boracay — its unforgettable white and talc-like beach drew two million tourists into central Philippines in 2017 — would be closed for environment rehabilitation for six months starting April 26.

“All I wanna say (about Boracay) stuck in my damn throat,” journalist and nature lover Teddy Montelibano said on his Facebook account.
In reaction to a well-guarded Boracay on the eve of its closure, lawyer Pilo Hilbay complained on Facebook: “The government acts as if they (tourists, local residents, business owners and resort workers) are the enemies.”
“We’ve been selling food at a discount before closing shop,” fast food worker Paula Padalhin told ABS-CBN, a TV network.
“Before Boracay’s closure, we cooked only six kilos of meat per day. In better times, we would cook 60 kilos of meat a day. We stopped serving expensive steaks and ribs. We just served Filipino food like sinigang (fish in sour soup); adobo (meat in vinegar and soy sauce); and sisig (sautéed pig head and liver with lemon and chili) — to finish our stock and recover losses,” Ronald Marquez, supervisor of Willy’s Rock Bar, said on TV.
“Before Boracay’s last day, beers and soft drinks were sold by volumes, if not given away, to staff members,” Marquez said.
“Boracay shirts were sold at 100 pesos (Dh7) each, from a 300-peso price tag. Tourists took home keepsakes before they said good-bye to Boracay.” Franco Dacillo of Island Souvenirs also said on TV.
“We are not saying goodbye. We are preparing for the new phase of Boracay. We are compliant, we are not worried,” Shirley Parcon, manager of Casa Pilar, told Gulf News in a phone interview. The 82-room boutique hotel on a one-hectare lot on Boracay’s Station Three — owned by former mayor Jose Yap, who served from 2010 to 2016 — would be vacant for six months.
“I’m happy. Our identification cards would allow residents to swim in Boracay while it’s totally closed to tourists,” Alina Sarvaez told Gulf News. She did not mind complaints about alleged fraud in the issuance of IDs.
“Boracay’s closure will mean loss of 1.96 billion pesos in six months. It will not affect the country’s GDP,” socio-economic Planning Secretary Ernesto Pernia said to allay fears.
But One Boracay, a group of stakeholders, calculated that 56 billion pesos in tourism revenues would be lost due to the tourist ban.
The government has released 2 billion pesos for salaries of 19,000 displaced resort workers, who will be hired to dismantle structures built on creeks, forest, watersheds and wetland areas, near and over the beach. “They will help solve Boracay’s two problems: flooding and environment degradation,” said Environment Secretary Roy Cimatu,
In February, Cimatu discussed with the Ayala Group, owner of Manila Water Company and its subsidiary, the Boracay Island Water Company, Inc. (a water concessionaire), to expand the latter’s waste water treatment services and solve Boracay’s problematic sewage system.
“Some 300 out of 800 establishments in Boracay were found dumping untreated waste water directly into the sea or canals. They were advised to connect to BIWC’s sewage treatment plant or construct their own wastewater treatment facilities,” said Cimatu, adding his department’s Pollution Adjudication Board will slap penalties to non-compliant companies. He did not reveal the government’s total outlay for the rehabilitation of Boracay’s bad sewage system.
On March 5, Duterte approved Boracay’s total closure, after calling it a cesspool in February. He announced transforming Boracay’s 1,000 hectares into land reform area; and rejected plans of Macau-based Galaxy Entertainment and its Filipino partner, Leisure and Resorts World Corp (LRWC), to build a $ 500-million casino-resort in Boracay.
In 2017, TripAdvisor ranked Boracay one of the world’s top 25. In 2012, Travel and Leisure magazine declared Boracay the world’s best beach island. Conde Nast Traveler has consistently praised Boracay.

Department of Tourism warns tourists against bogus travel agents

DOT warns tourists against bogus travel agents



By Bing J. Jaleco 

MANILA, Philippines - DOT Secretary Wanda Teo said hundreds of thousands of Filipino tourists travel domestically during the summer period. 

With the summer season officially on in the Philippines, the Department of Tourism (DOT) reminded the public against bogus travel agencies, which usually offer “too-good-to-be-true” tour packages online. 

DOT Secretary Wanda Teo said hundreds of thousands of Filipino tourists travel domestically during the summer period. 

Based on DOT statistics, at least seven million Filipinos travel around the country between April and May, with Cebu as the top destination for locals. 

With this, Teo said, the public must be ‘WISE’ in their travel plans, an acronym for “Work out your travel plans; Identify tour and travel agencies; See tourism quality seal; and Engage accredited service providers only.” 

The DOT launched the ‘WISE’ campaign last year to help locals avoid being scammed by fake travel agencies that are prevalent on social media. 

“We are in close coordination with the DOT regional offices to make sure that the list of accredited establishment and services are updated and posted in strategic locations, such as airports, terminals, and ports for easy reference,” Teo said. 

She advised the public to verify the legitimacy of travel and tour companies by calling DOT regional offices, or by visiting DOT’s database online at www.accreditationonline.tourism.gov.ph. 

Teo said travellers can also judge the authenticity of the travel agency by checking the tourism quality seal displayed at their offices, websites, and social media accounts. 

She warned DOT-accredited travel agencies found to be involved in illegal activities would be stripped of their accreditation

Thursday, April 19, 2018

Pacquiao wants Duterte at ringside


President Rodrigo Duterte raises the hand of Sen. Manny Pacquiao during a courtesy call at Malacañan in December 2016.
The STAR, File
Pacquiao wants Duterte at ringside for Matthysse fight
18SHARES101
Abac Cordero (philstar.com) - April 18, 2018 - 8:02pm
MANILA, Philippines – Manny Pacquiao wants President Duterte to be at ringside when the Filipino boxing icon challenges Argentina’s Lucas Matthysse on July 15 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
“If the President is not busy,” said Pacquiao in Wednesday’s press conference at the City of Dreams.
No sitting President has ever come to watch Pacquiao fight overseas, and Duterte, his close friend, could be the first.
“I want to invite him,” said Pacquiao.

The line was drawn heading to the July 15 title clash in Malaysia when Matthysse, who’s in the biggest fight of his career, said Pacquiao’s “time is over.”
But Pacquiao is not to be carried away, and in his business suit accorded the champion from Argentina a warm welcome.
During the customary staredown, in front of all the cameras, Pacquiao smiled at Matthysse.
Face to face, they sized each other up, with the WBA belt in between them. They shook hands afterwards.
On Thursday night, they will board the same plane that will take them to Kuala Lumpur for another press conference scheduled on Friday.
Then on Saturday, they fly back to Manila, and go separate ways. The next time they meet again will be on fight week.
Matthysse arrived in Manila Wednesday morning, joined by his manager and promoter, Mario Arano, Golden Boy Promotions president Eric Gomez and PR director Ramiro Gonzalez.
“It was good. It was nice. It was a long trip obviously but it was nice. It’s the normal. I’m a little tired. But we were comfortable,” said Matthysse of the journey that took over 30 hours.
Matthysse said he knows little about the Philippines but came to the press conference in Barong.

“Out of respect,” he said.
“I don’t know too much about the Philippines. I know it’s a beautiful country. And the people have been so nice to me since I got here,” added Matthysse.
It was the first time, too, that he met Pacquiao face to face.
“I’ve seen many of his fights on TV. But I’ve never met him in person,” he said.
They're just getting to know each other.

Read more at https://www.philstar.com/sports/2018/04/18/1807206/pacquiao-wants-duterte-ringside-matthysse-fight#By6DoGUTokj7SVcx.99

Monday, April 16, 2018

That's not a bad idea ....

THAT'S NOT A BAD IDEA

Very often - sometimes too often! - the thought is back! If we wake up in the morning (or even many times in the middle of the night), the thought is back. Sometimes, the thought will not let us sleep. The "act of thinking", the "reflection", the "opinion" or the "serious consideration", no matter, how we describe it - our memory and conscience is always with us as a permanent companion.

We brood over unsettled problem. Sometimes, we bear unfair treatments, arrogance, ignorance, incompetent know-it-all-betters, and unbearable oddballs, who inexorable love to make our life a hell while living themselves a disorderly life.


We would not like to be distracted, but we're toying with some good ideas how we could throw overboard all that "human garbage". What will come next is a matter of conjecture.

Of course, I've got my ideas, but I'm not a mind reader. Too many trains of thought make us thoughtless and absent-minded -  especially in difficult and important daily life situations.

Does waiting and/or sleeping solve our problems? Or is it just again in time? Our life's central idea should not be, that while waiting, time solves all our problems. Thoughts should intensify, condense and deepen plans follow by actions.

It's good and helpful to carry thoughts in us all the time. Incomprehensible, or better unfinished and un-matured thoughts, no matter whether positive or negative, should be slept on, before tiredness outstrips us with supersonic speed.

Sometimes, we feel that our thoughts and ideas can't be fulfilled with life. Where the heart is willing, it will find a thousand ways; but where the heart is weak, it will find a thousands excuses. If doubts begin to take roots, we should rouse from pink-tinted idealism or wear down and annihilate nightmares and erase and wipe out such thoughts and ideas.

If our thoughts are good and have the chance to be fulfilled in action, especially if "the other side" is prepared and willing to step on to such a bridge of life, we might get a support and words of encouragement.

And, if not? No action? 

Maybe it is God's will to keep and protect us from a careless, rash, disadvantageous and uneasy action. Every new day gives us new inexhaustible possibilities to survive, to bear trials and to start a new beginning. We overlook and fail to notice many chances in lie through our sluggishness and laziness while thinking and dreaming of unequaled and unfulfilled ideas.

And, my dear readers: As we all know - our time on earth is limited... .

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Philippines privacy body probes Facebook data breach


54SHARES1011
Janvic Mateo (The Philippine Star) -
MANILA, Philippines — The National Privacy Commission (NPC) has launched an investigation against social media giant Facebook over a massive data breach involving British consultancy firm Cambridge Analytica.
NPC officials this week sent a letter to Facebook founder and chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg directing the company to submit information regarding the processing of Facebook data of some 1.18 million Filipino users affected by the incident.
“The Philippines has exceeded user growth projections and now has more than 67 million active Facebook users. It is our duty to protect the data privacy interests of these users, and to provide those affected with avenues of redress,” read the four-page letter dated April 11.
The letter, signed by privacy commissioner Raymund Liboro and deputy commissioners Ivy Patdu and Leandro Angelo Aguirre, was sent to Facebook after Zuckerberg admitted that the company has been remiss of its duty to protect the personal data of its users.

The social media giant is currently under fire following reports that Cambridge Analytica was able to illegally harvest data from millions of users through a third party program.
Earlier data released by Facebook showed that the Philippines ranked second in terms of the number of users affected by the data breach, next to the United States which had data of 70 million users compromised. 
In its letter to Zuckerberg, the NPC said the response of the company has been generic and inadequate to satisfy the mounting concerns of Filipino users.
“We are launching an investigation into Facebook to determine whether there is unauthorized processing of personal data of Filipinos, and other possible violations of the Data Privacy Act of 2012,” said the privacy body.
“We will look into Facebook’s adherence of the data processing principles of transparency, legitimate purpose, and proportionality required of every personal information controller processing the personal data of Filipinos. We will also examine whether Facebook upholds data subject rights,” it added.
The NPC officials directed Facebook to submit documentation on tools and specific processes performed on Filipino users on the social media platform, particularly on the use of artificial intelligence to process data.
Advertisement

“If any of these processes involves any outsourcing, please provide us with contracts entered into with such entities,” read the letter.
“We shall also require more information on Facebook’s data sharing with third parties. Kindly prove documentation on any legal ties that limit or regulate how this data is shared,” it added.
On the incident involving Cambridge Analytica, the NPC asked Zuckerberg to provide a more detailed timeline of the incidents relating to the discovery of abuse committed by the third party developer.
“We understand that you also developed tools to determine the existence of abuse in 2014, and that for some reason, these tools were not able to detect abuse on the part of Cambridge Analytica and other similar programs at other academic institutions,” said the NPC.
“Please provide us with that documentation and other evidence in your possession on any abuse of data from 2012 to the present,” it added.
The privacy body also asked Zuckerberg to submit forensic digital artifacts related to the incident.

Foreign intervention

Meanwhile, election monitor Kontra Daya called on the NPC to thoroughly investigate the improper sharing of more than one million Filipino Facebook users’ information with data analytics firm Cambridge Analytica, saying this is tantamount to foreign intervention in the country’s electoral exercise.
“Any invasion of privacy is unacceptable and should be investigated immediately. Any foreign intervention in our country’s electoral system should be opposed relentlessly,” Kontra Daya said in a statement issued yesterday.
Facebook had admitted to the improper sharing of information of around 87 million people’s Facebook accounts, 82 percent of which are from the US. Cambridge Analytica’s parent firm, Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL) also claimed to have helped in the election campaigns of Philippine Presidents Benigno Aquino III in 2010 and Rodrigo Duterte in 2016.
“One may argue that 1.2 million ‘compromised’ accounts is just a small percentage of the estimated 36.2 million Facebook users in the Philippines. But even then, it cannot be denied that the privacy of these 1.2 million Filipinos has been compromised when University of Cambridge Psychology Lecturer Aleksandr Kogan developed the app ‘thisisyourdigitallife’ and then shared the user data with SCL/Cambridge Analytica and Eunoia Technologies,” the group said.
Kontra Daya said the case should refresh the public’s memory of the massive leak of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) of the database, when its voter information was also leaked.
“If there is a lesson that can be learned from the controversy surrounding Cambridge Analytica and SCL, it is that there should be no foreign intervention in the country’s electoral exercise. Just like the Comelec, the political parties, lobby groups and public relations firms should be held accountable for the deals they make to ensure victory for their candidates or clients,” Kontra Daya said.
It is high time for the Senate and the House of Representatives to conduct an investigation into the role of Cambridge Analytica and SCL in the national elections, the group urged, further stating the importance to require Facebook to explain the full extent of the data breach involving users in the Philippines and if such data influenced the outcome of elections. 
It also called on political parties, lobby groups and PR firms to be more transparent in their operations especially during election season.
“While there are clear laws on election expenditures, it is imperative that partnerships with individuals and groups be disclosed and that foreigners be disallowed from intervening in the election campaigns in any way,” it added. 
“The people’s rights to privacy and suffrage cannot be compromised to satisfy the political agenda of the few. And as the 2019 senatorial and local elections roll around and we choose wisely to elect our next leaders, may we all be reminded that no one, most especially shady foreign entities, should be allowed to violate our rights,” the group stressed. – With Louella Desiderio, Rainier Allan Ronda, Paolo Romero